With employer-provided healthcare plan costs expected to rise by an average of 5.6% in 2023, the personal-finance website WalletHub released its report on 2023’s Healthiest & Unhealthiest Cities in America.
City leaders need to stay vigilant for any future health crises to safeguard the wellness of their residents.
When a city doesn’t take care of these many important issues, it can be hard to keep up good health.
To identify the places where health is a priority, WalletHub compared more than 180 of the largest U.S. cities across 43 key metrics. The data set ranges from the cost of a medical visit to fruit and vegetable consumption to the percentage of residents who are fully vaccinated.
Healthiest Cities | Unhealthiest Cities |
1. San Francisco, CA | 173. Corpus Christi, TX |
2. Seattle, WA | 174. Laredo, TX |
3. Honolulu, HI | 175. Fayetteville, NC |
4. San Diego, CA | 176. Memphis, TN |
5. Salt Lake City, UT | 177. Montgomery, AL |
6. Portland, OR | 178. Augusta, GA |
7. Washington, DC | 179. Columbus, GA |
8. Minneapolis, MN | 180. Shreveport, LA |
9. Denver, CO | 181. Gulfport, MS |
10. Irvine, CA | 182. Brownsville, TX |
Orgul D. Ozturk
Department Chair and Professor, Economics, Darla Moore School of Business – University of South Carolina
Measures local authorities can take to improve health care
Cities need clean air, good public transportation, bike lanes, trails in the city or nearby, access to many green public spaces, and access to good healthy food (farmer markets, etc. – no food deserts). Cities, where retail and living spaces are integrated, are also on average healthier, I think.
Yilu Lin
Ph.D., MPH – Research Assistant Professor, Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine – Tulane University
What are the most important factors to consider in choosing a city that is good for your health?
I think the first and foremost factor is the accessibility of healthcare resources. The quality of healthcare facilities and the availability of medical professionals are important for maintaining health. Environmental factors like air quality and climate are always a consideration before choosing a city. City infrastructure such as well-maintained sidewalks, bike lanes, trails, gyms, community centers, and sports clubs can also contribute to the decision.
J. Douglas Thornton
Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy; Director, The Prescription Drug Misuse Education and Research (PREMIER) Center – University of Houston College of Pharmacy
Local authorities could improve our cities and states by making outdoor environments more welcoming to people. First, walkable cities and appropriate infrastructure help individuals engage with their communities and socialize across socio-economic strata. Second, reducing pollution and providing an opportunity for their citizens to engage with their physical environment is a way to improve the well-being of their constituents.
Key Stats
- Fremont, California, has the lowest share of physically unhealthy adults, 6.20 percent, which is 2.8 times lower than in Newark, New Jersey, the city with the highest at 17.60 percent.
- Laredo, Texas, has the lowest cost per doctor’s visit, $65.00, which is 3.6 times less expensive than in Juneau, Alaska, the city with the highest at $235.22.
- Portland, Maine, has the lowest share of adults eating fruit less than once daily, 32.00 percent, which is 1.6 times lower than in Chattanooga, Tennessee, the city with the highest at 52.60 percent.
- Glendale, Arizona, has the lowest average monthly cost for a fitness-club membership, $15.00, which is 7.1 times less expensive than in Juneau, Alaska, the city with the highest at $106.88.
View the full report:
https://wallethub.com/edu/healthiest-cities/31072
Methodology
In order to identify the overall healthiest cities in the U.S., WalletHub compared 182 cities — including the 150 most populated U.S. cities, plus at least two of the most populated cities in each state — across four key dimensions: 1) Health Care, 2) Food, 3) Fitness and 4) Green Space. The sample considers only the city proper in each case and excludes cities in the surrounding metro area.
We evaluated the four dimensions using 43 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for a healthy lifestyle. Data for metrics marked with an asterisk (*) were available at the state level only. For metrics marked with two asterisks (**), we calculated the population size using the square root of the population in order to avoid overcompensating for minor differences across cities.
To feature your research, contact Fromgirltogirl.com.
Email: advertise@fromgirltogirl.com